Microsoft Fabric Cost & Performance Audit
A forensic review that identifies what is driving cost, what is degrading performance, and what to fix first. Every finding comes with a prioritised action plan.
The problem
Rising cost usually comes from deeper architectural and operational issues that standard monitoring does not surface clearly. The real causes are typically:
Is this audit for you?
Why this audit is different
Most reviews examine individual workloads in isolation. This audit examines the relationships between capacity configuration, pipeline engineering, semantic model design, storage architecture, and workload scheduling as a connected system.
Findings are prioritised by business impact, implementation effort, risk reduction, and cost savings. The outcome is a practical remediation roadmap, not a list of technical observations.
Typical outcomes
What the audit examines
Capacity and licensing
Whether your current SKU and licensing structure is costing more than your workloads actually require
Workload patterns
What is consuming capacity, when, and whether scheduling conflicts are degrading performance across the platform
Pipeline architecture
Where design inefficiencies are simultaneously slowing delivery and driving unnecessary CU consumption
Storage efficiency
Whether your data layer is structured to support both query performance and cost efficient storage
Semantic layer and reporting load
How semantic model design and refresh patterns are affecting both report speed and overall capacity health
Workspace configuration
Platform settings and structural decisions quietly working against both cost efficiency and performance reliability
What the final report looks like
Every audit produces the same structured set of outputs. Here is a preview of what each section contains.
A detailed opening covering total findings, risk breakdown, estimated saving range, and the highest priority actions. Written for decision makers, not technical teams.
Findings plotted by severity across all six assessment areas, showing where risk is concentrated.
Each finding mapped to estimated saving and effort, so you know where to act first.
A prioritised action plan ranked by impact, effort, and risk, with clear ownership and sequencing guidance.
Your environment rated across five domains, each with a score, risk level, and next steps.
Platform level patterns sitting above individual findings, governance gaps, undocumented ownership, and structural risks that affect the environment as a whole.
How it works
Complete the short intake form
Confirms your environment is within scope. Takes under two minutes. No commitment at this stage.
Scope confirmed and proposal issued
I review your intake details and send a scoped proposal to your email within 24 hours.
Read only access provided
No admin rights required. No changes are made to your environment at any point during the audit.
Audit completed
I conduct the full diagnostic across all five domains and compile findings into the structured report.
Report and readout delivered
Final report delivered within the agreed timeframe, followed by a live readout session with your team.
What you receive
Maturity scorecard
The audit examines six technical assessment areas. Those findings are then consolidated into a five domain operational maturity model that measures the overall health of your Fabric platform.
Each domain receives a specific rating, improvement recommendations, and prioritised next steps.
Engagement scope
What is not included
Timeline
Fixed fee audit
Engagement fee
£3,000
Many clients choose to act on the findings with a follow on optimisation engagement. That conversation happens at the readout session, not before.
About
Emmanuel Obikili
Microsoft Fabric Architect and Data Platform Consultant
Over 10 years delivering enterprise data platform and analytics solutions across Microsoft Fabric, Power BI, Azure Synapse, SQL Server, and Azure Data Factory. Sectors served include financial services, professional services, public sector, and retail.
I specialise in helping organisations diagnose platform cost, performance, governance, and reliability issues before they become expensive operational problems.
Every audit is conducted personally by me. Not delegated.
Connect on LinkedInCommon questions
Who is this audit not suitable for?
This audit is not the right fit if you are still evaluating whether to adopt Fabric, have no production workloads running yet, or have no active Fabric capacity. The audit is designed for environments already in production and already incurring costs. If you are at an earlier stage, the findings would have limited practical value.
Do you need admin access, and will this affect our production systems?
No to both. The audit is conducted with read only access. No changes are made to your environment at any point, and there is no risk of disruption to production workloads.
What do you need from us to get started?
Complete the short intake form. Once scope is confirmed, I will request read only access to the relevant Fabric capacities and workspaces. No complex onboarding required.
Is implementation of the findings included?
No. The audit delivers findings, recommendations, and a prioritised roadmap. Implementation is a separate engagement and is discussed at the readout session if you choose to proceed.
Can this be done fully remotely?
Yes. The audit is conducted entirely remotely. The readout session is delivered via Teams or your preferred video platform.
We are relatively new to Fabric. Is this still suitable?
Yes. If you are already incurring capacity costs or seeing performance issues, the audit is relevant regardless of how long you have been on Fabric.
What happens after the audit?
You receive the report, attend the readout session, and have 14 days of post delivery support for questions on the findings. Many clients then proceed with a follow on optimisation engagement.
Get in touch
Complete the short form and I will confirm scope and send a proposal within 24 hours. No commitment required at this stage.
Check My Environment